The story behind the index
Why I built this
I'm not an academic researcher. I'm not an AI company. I'm a parent in Israel who saw something I couldn't find a real answer to.
01
The moment it got personal
In late 2025, I read about a father who got a phone call from "his son". The voice was identical. The story was convincing — car accident, need money now, don't tell mom. He transferred $25,000. His son was at work, had no idea any of this happened.
It wasn't a tech article. It was on the evening news. And the next day it wasn't the lead story — because it wasn't new anymore. It was normal.
I asked myself: how would I know when something became normal? I had nowhere to check.
02
What didn't exist
I read everything. AGI is coming in 2027. AGI will never come. ChatGPT changed everything you think. ChatGPT is a bubble. Everyone is right. No one is right. All superlatives, no numbers.
I was looking for one simple thing: a single number for where AI is today. Not a prediction. Not spin. Just "where we are, on a 0-to-100 scale, based on evidence."
It didn't exist. So I built it.
03
What this is
The AI Index is one number, 0 to 100, updated twice daily. It measures AI progression across 4 dimensions: capability, autonomy, integration in critical systems, and control bypass.
40 sources are scanned twice daily: Anthropic, OpenAI, Nature, MIT, Reuters, Bloomberg, and more. Only events from the last 12 hours count. Minimum impact threshold: ±0.2. Max 8 drivers per day. Every event links back to its original source.
No imagination. No guessing. If it didn't happen and isn't documented, it isn't counted.
I don't know how this ends.
I don't know if the score will be 60, 80, or 100 in two years. I know I'll be here, twice a day, measuring what is.
If it's useful to you — join the waitlist. If not — at least take the defense guide. It's free.
Join the waitlist →